Adirondack Almanack: Leg-Hold Traps Criticized: UPDATED

Monday, December 14, 2009

Leg-Hold Traps Criticized: UPDATED

Wildlife rehabilitators who helped rescue a bald eagle last week say trappers and state regulators should reconsider use of leg-hold traps.

This bald eagle became ensnared near Moffits Beach, on Sacandaga Lake in Hamilton County, but was able to fly off with the trap still attached. The five-foot-long chain it was dragging then snagged in the branch of a tree 16 feet above the ground. The bird was discovered by the trapper on December 6 hanging upside down.

The trapper contacted the Hamilton County Sheriff's office, which called Lake Pleasant–based Forest Ranger Thomas Eakin, who used a pole to bring the bird safely to the ground. He then wrapped the bird in cargo netting from his pickup truck and kept it warm until wildlife rehabilitator Wendy Hall, of the Wilmington refuge Adirondack Wildlife, arrived. She transported the eagle to two Saratoga-based North Country Wild Care rehabbers.

Hall said that the eagle is perching and appears to be mending well from superficial wounds. She thinks its chances of release back into the wild are high. However, the prospects of a red-tailed hawk whose leg was severed this fall in a leg-hold trap in Brushton are not as good. Most raptors brought to wildlife rehabilitators have been hit by cars, Hall said, and most cannot be released. Many captives then become part of educational programs.

The trapper broke no rules and acted responsibly by reporting the injured eagle, those involved in the rescue said. But these two birds prompted Hall to write an essay, “What’s wrong with leg-hold traps?”, for her Web site, adirondackwildlife.org. She respects hunters and says they are wildlife rehabilitators’ best allies. “However, we will never understand why New York continues to permit the use of leghold traps for wildlife. They banned the use of snares and toothed leghold traps, but this does not really address the two main problems with the non-toothed clamp traps which are still legal in New York.

"The first problem is that any wildlife so trapped is going to suffer unimaginable agony, and in many documented cases, the animal will chew off its own leg to effect its escape. These traps do not legally need to be checked by the trapper more than once every 24 hours, which means the captive animal not only may suffer for long periods, but runs the additional risk of drawing in predators attracted by the noise of the creature's struggles, and who will naturally take advantage of the creature's inability to flee. Some folks say that's nature. We call it interference.”

Others say the problem is not the traps themselves. There is movement to change the regulation to prohibit use of "exposed" bait, which can be seen from the air by raptors, which are sight hunters. The Moffits trap was baited with a beaver carcass with the intention of trapping a coyote. Pelts are a source of income for many Adirondackers.

Photograph by Thomas Eakin, NYS DEC

14 Comments:

Anonymous said...

I prefer the updated version! Indeed, incidents like this can be avoided by using a different set, and the NYS trapping rules are filled with regulations intended to reduce the chance of capturing a non-target species. I wouldn't be surprised if next year's rules contain some direct responses to this incident.

There's no denying that some methods of trapping are cruel, and I have a tough time mustering up a moral defense for it. Sure, nature is a cruel place, and other human actions such as driving result in the maiming and suffering of many, many times more animals, but that doesn't seem like much of a defense.

But as you point out, trapping is an important source of income for many Adirondack residents who don't have many other options. "Back in the day" before fur fell into disfavor, a trapper could even make a good living from it. For this reason, I'll keep my criticism of the practice muted.

John Warren said...

Seems like a good spot to post the following request from a reader which I received just yesterday:

Mr. Warren,
I was wondering if you were aware of anyone in or around the park who makes fur hats. In particular beaver pelt hats. I have a lot of beavers on my property and someone traps them periodically to keep the population in check. Please let me know if anything pops into your head.
Thanks,
[Name Withheld For Privacy]

Let me know if anyone has any ideas - John

Anonymous said...

Leg hold traps are a barbaric vestige from a by-gone era. They should be eliminated from modern society immediately.

diane said...

My dog got caught in a leg hold trap in November. The smell of the bait attracted him and he stepped in the trap. My husband was about 100 feet away and ran to see what the dog was howling about! In the process of trying to release the trap, our dog bit my husband in the hand.

My husband came out worse from the experience than the dog. The dog wasn't injured, but my husband lost work and was in pain for a week.

We went to the DEC about it, and everything about the trap was legal, except the person had not gotten permission to trap at that location, and trapping was not allowed in the area where they were. But, because it wasn't posted, the trapper couldn't be prosecuted.

I too, understand the need to supplement income here in the Adirondacks, but there has to be a better way to trap than using a leg hold trap.

Anonymous said...

Public sentiment will turn against Eagles when they start eating house cats. Off the coast of Maine there's a problem already with too many Eagles eating all the local birds hatchlings. Reminds me of how my own mind set changed when the deer started decimating my pumpkins.

Anonymous said...

6:51 - The rumor is that eagles love eating loon chicks. It makes a lot of sense and is probably true, but I heard this from someone who I suspect was trying to rile up the birders in the family. Oh, the divided loyalties!

As far as cruelty goes, I think those glue traps for mice are a lot worse than a legal leg-hold trap. I once had to "take care" of an occupied one that a vegetarian had placed in her kitchen and had not checked for days - despite being a hunter and from a farm family, I got no pleasure out of lecturing her about how cruel those things are.

Mauigirl said...

Leg-hold traps and glue traps should both be banned.

I am not a hunter and would never hunt personally, but I eat meat and I have no problem with hunters who kill cleanly and eat the meat of the animal they kill. I do not believe in killing animals just for their fur or their heads, and I don't believe in any type of trap that causes the animal (whether a mouse or a fox) pain and suffering. It is inhumane.

Anonymous said...

I have personally put my hand in the different kinds of traps I own, and they do not cause much pain. And if leg holds are made illegal the next thing that people would be complaining about is body griping traps. Just like it said most of the birds have been hit by cars. And I don't see anyone trying to outlaw those.

Anonymous said...

My first question is why do we feel that every single creature that lives on earth is like a human? We are living in a generation that humanizes everything on the planet and unfortunately it is a skewed sense of reality. Yes, incidental catchs do occur but that is the reason why leg hold traps are the best option. I would like you to view the video entitled Destroying the Myth (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rsj-2o0ux14) Leg hold traps are very humane traps and many trappers that use them often are able to let go, unharmed mind you, animals that may be young of the year or not intended catchs. Incidental catchs occur much less often than a lot of people try to force down the throat of unexpecting viewers in the media. And the comment of trying to keep the eagle warm until someone could help him? Last I knew, eagles lived outside in all sorts of conditions. Again, lets hug and cuddle the disney version of animals because that is what a human would need if it was in this situation.

I think its time to stop humanizing everything in the world and start humanizing humans. We often treat each other with less respect and more distaste than we do the rest of the planet. The trapper did the right thing. HE called the local authorities to help in the matter. He shouldn't have had an uncovered carcass as bait for a trap. Not a sensible move on the trappers part but he could have easily made a second wrong decision and decided to take the matters into his own hands.

Let's stop pretending that this world is full of Bambi, Thumper, and Nemo's and remember that without control of these predator species, they die horrible miserable deaths due to mange, rabies, and distemper, among other things. Have you ever seen this? If you have, then you will never forget it.

Most trappers are not heartless individuals and accidents happens, but accidents happen every day in all the decisions we make as humans. Where do we draw the line? Don't attack one of the safest and humane methods of trapping an animal because of a couple accidents. Get your facts straight first.

Anonymous said...

well, first off, if animals are in soo much pain while theya re in the trap, why are they asleep alot of the time when the trapper shows up? and usually there is not alot of damage around the area where the animal would have been "fighting" the trap.

last time i checked NY already had a regulation against exposed bait.

there is already a large population of coyotes in NY, that are causing problems. coyotes rarely can be caught in a cage trap. so how do these uneducated writers propose to keep the populations in check?

Steve Hall said...

I'm Wendy's husband, and I wrote the article at www.adirondackwildlife.org. These dialogues are useful, because we learn when we share our experiences with each other.

I've always said the good news about the internet is that there is so much information out there, and the bad news is that there is so much information out there. Obviously, much of the information is skewed to support a given position, and everyone can provide photographs, essays and youtube videos to advance their case, for example, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9ibmOxF_dQ.

If these dialogues lead to legislation, or the enforcement of existing laws, that minimize the suffering of animals caught in traps, pinpoint exactly which traps are least likely to injure the captive animal, while discouraging the approach of non-targeted animals, that is all for the good.

To address some of the misconceptions and specious arguments we've heard repeated often: When any animal (or human) goes into shock, they suffer heat loss, which is why attempts to keep them warm and stabilize their temperature are one of the first procedures undertaken. It has nothing to do with whether they live outside or in. In the case of raptors, we often use blankets at the point of collection to not only conserve the raptor's body temperature, but to avoid being taloned!

Trappers complain that more animals are killed by cars, but neglect to observe that it is not the driver's intention to strike the animal. We call this the "I'm a piece of nature, and have no choice in whether I trap or not" argument.

It's also a peculiar stretch to suggest that killing animals in traps, spares them other, more natural forms of death.

The most important point is that the marketplace will determine the fate of trapping. Personal outrage or indignation accomplishes nothing. As long as we insist on wearing real furs, trapping, as well as the existence of inhumane farms for raising fur-bearing animals for the fur trade, will continue. If the public realizes that synthetic furs are cheaper, look better, are more durable and don't injure wildlife, and also conclude that its' possible to celebrate wildlife without having to wear it. Steve Hall

John Warren said...

Mike Lynch at the Adirondack Daily Enterprise has picked up this story as well: http://www.adirondackdailyenterprise.com/page/content.detail/id/510314.html?nav=5008

Bob & Lisa said...

Mr. Warren,
I've made coonskin hats our of hides we tanned ourselves.

So now for the rebuttal from the trapper (my husband) who caught the eagle (and in fact played a big part in the rescue). Ranger Eakin cut a pole and with the help of Deputy Wilt lifted the trap drag off the branch so that the eagle could fall to the ground where my husband and I were waiting with the net that we threw over the bird to keep him from flying off again. The bird was so cooperative as to flip over onto his belly on the blanket Eakin provided so that we keep him off the snow, and cover him with the blanket we provided. Having caught his own finger in the same trap we know that it doesn't break bones or do any damage in and of itself. It didn't even really hurt so the traps are as gentle as is possible. In over 30 yrs. of trapping the only animal he's ever seen chew off it's leg was a muskrat that the trap failed to drown. And having caught many rats missing legs - they recover and live just fine without it. He's never had anything other than a squirrel or rabbit that was caught in the trap become a meal for a predator - and that's natural. Nobody should be commenting on the trap set because nobody ever looked at it. The carcass was buried, although the coyote that was also caught the same time exposed part of it. There are two types of traps, leg grippers and body grippers (conibers). Instead of complaining that leg grippers should be outlawed (leaving only body grippers available for use) you should realize that an animal caught in a body gripper is dead when the trapper arrives - a much worse situation for the dog, cat, eagle who sticks his nose where it doesn't belong. Caught a dog and a cat this year in different leg grippers. They were released without injury to grateful and understanding owners. Dog was off leash, owner accepted responsibility. Cat belonged to a former trapper. Most domestics don't run off and fight the trap (which causes some pain) rather they lay there and wait for assistance. Ever stepped on your dog's toe? Probably more painful than the snap of the trap jaws. Oh, and the eagle was released two days after being rescued. And the rehabilitator told the ECO on scene that this was the first eagle in a trap she'd seen in 15 yrs as a rehabilitator. So let's direct that righteous indignation toward all those abused and neglected domestic animals in our communities rather than making such a big deal out of a once in a lifetime mishap that had a happy outcome - no permanent injury and a happy reunion with his mate, who happened to have been waiting nearby while he was in the tree. And an awesome memory to have had my hand a mere few inches from his majestic head. A truly magnificent bird with no fear, nor anger toward the humans I'm sure he knew were trying to help. Just an amazing calm and patience in those all-seeing eyes that commanded respect. And to think I've heard mention that our national bird was almost the turkey?

Steve Hall said...

Lisa alleges "the eagle was released two days after being rescued. And the rehabilitator told the ECO on scene that this was the first eagle in a trap she'd seen in 15 yrs as a rehabilitator." Since my wife was the rehabber on the scene, and is directly involved in rehabbing the eagle, I have to assume Lisa is either lying or misinformed. As of January 20th. the eagle is still being rehabbed, and my wife never made the comment about the first eagle seen in a trap, all of which is besides the point of the article. I suugest you read the article at www.AdirondackWildlife.org, take a real good look at the photographs, and then try to come up with a new spin. I can only laugh when two people are looking directly at the same evidence, and one tries to deny what the other sees with their own eyes. Steve Hall