Saturday, July 29, 2017

Verplanck Colvin and Politics Today

Colvin HeadshotLast month we went to see Bill Killon’s documentary, “Colvin: Hero of the North Woods” at the Adirondack History Museum in Elizabethtown. Surveyor and forest-preserve advocate Verplanck Colvin has always been something of a hero of mine, and not because he has the funniest name associated with the Adirondacks. He doesn’t. He doesn’t even have the funniest name beginning with V, an honor that goes to — and I assume I will get no argument here — the mountain that goes by the name of Vanderwhacker.

It’s an excellent film, drawing on the observations of a veritable Mount Rushmore of contemporary Adirondack voices, and deftly and artfully edited by Killon to show Colvin’s strengths, weaknesses and complexities. In a classic touch, an Adirondack downpour lends a comforting background serenade to an interview with Tony Goodwin, symbolic, perhaps, of the waters that Colvin was so inclined to protect.

Verplanck Colvin was inspired by a book. The scion of a wealthy attorney, and primed for a career in law, Colvin was 18 when Alfred Billings Street, an Albany poet who drew his inspiration from the High Peaks, handed him a copy of his book Woods and Waters.

This is why you should never give a young person a book. They are likely to take it and run with it in ways that run contrary to established thinking.

For the next three years, Colvin summered in the Adirondacks where, building on the surveying knowledge he had acquired while dabbling in real estate law, he cooked up an idea for a geological survey of the mountains.

This was in 1870, when the North Country was still enjoying “howling wilderness” status. Civilization was only beginning to creep in at that point — Frederick Durant’s dazzling, electrically lit Prospect House hotel on Blue Mountain Lake was a little more than a decade away at that point. But if the upper crust had not quite discovered the mountains, the loggers had, and when Colvin made the first ascent of Seward in 1870 he was appalled at a view that included hillsides stripped naked of their forest canopy.

Doubtless, Colvin had also read the book Man and Nature published six years prior by an attorney and ambassador to the Ottoman Empire, George Perkins Marsh. Marsh argued that — citing the Mediterranean basin as an example — deforestation dried things up.

These were the days when men of privilege like Colvin and Marsh did great things for civilization. Today they would be running hedge funds, or jacking up the price of elderly people’s medicine.

Colvin, however, took Marsh’s groundwork and concocted what in my opinion is the greatest environmental dodge in the history of the planet: He told men of business that if the northern forests were not protected, their priceless canals, the lifeblood of New York’s inland commercial shipping and key to its growing international status, would run dry.

Maybe we should try this approach with climate change: That unless we reduce our carbon omissions, our coal mines will be flooded by melting polar caps. Which, speaking very long term here, is kind of true.

Anyway, it worked for Colvin. The Erie Canal was not quite a half-century old at this point, and still more than holding its own against the nascent New York Central railroad. The canal facilitated as many as 33,000 shipments annually, and is why New York, and not Baltimore or Philadelphia, became the world’s financial capital. It was that important. And Colvin told them that without the deep, water-retaining forest soils of the North, central New York would become a desert and the greatest mode of transport in America would become a useless, dusty ditch.

Mr. Goodwin is probably correct when he says Colvin oversold his hand, but I choose not to believe him because — I don’t know — casting a cloud over the great Forest Preserve creation myth is a little like telling a Christian there were no such people as Adam and Eve.

But the most fascinating thing in this whole story, particularly in this modern age, is that when Colvin spoke, the businessmen and politicians believed him. There were no cries of junk science or fake news. They took him at his word when he said the environment was a critical part of their existence.

Maybe in an age when glass could be made to glow, when people could engage in instantaneous communication from a thousand miles apart, when a mixture of light and chemicals could tease a piece of glass into producing a permanent image, and when massive engines made of iron could be convinced to roll on their own, the public knew better than to doubt. Not only did the state leaders believe Colvin, they funded further exploration of the subject. Imagine that.

And imagine if today Verplanck Colvin were to tell Congress that forests are essential to both life and commerce. Would he get even one vote out of the current majority party? Or would he be dismissed as a tree-hugger or snowflake or any other catchphrase moniker that people today embrace instead of fact?

I think we know the answer. And I think we can all be grateful that the great surveyor lived then instead of now.

Photo of Verplanck Colvin, courtesy Essex County Historical Center.


Tim Rowland

Tim Rowland is a humor columnist for Herald-Mail Media in Hagerstown, Md., and a New York Times bestselling author. His books include High Peaks; A History of Hiking the Adirondacks from Noah to Neoprene and Strange and Unusual Stories of New York City. He has climbed the 46 high peaks, is an avid bicyclist, and trout tremble with fear when they see his approaching shadow. He and his wife Beth will be residing in Jay, N.Y. by spring.




5 Responses

  1. Smitty says:

    Poor old Verplank. Yes, I know this is a humor column, but stating that forest removal would dry up the source of water for canals isn’t completely untrue. Forest removal doesn’t cause water to somehow disappear. But it does alter the hydrology, resulting in higher peak flows and lower low flows. So it could legitimately be argued that forest removal would cause inadequate flows during summer and fall low periods.

  2. Randy Fredlund says:

    Well written and spot on. I’ll be interested to see how contrary thinkers respond.

  3. Paul says:

    So much optimism for the present?

    Look everybody wants you to think that the sky is falling these days. People should really look around and see what is really going on. Look at our own Adirondacks for example. Over the last decade we have set aside almost 1 million acres of private land from any major development with conservation easements. That is basically one sixth of the park and all of it is private land. Also we have recently added seventy thousand acres of more protected land to the Forest Preserve. The land we are developing is being developed in a much smarter way then it ever was back in Colvin’s day.

    On a global scale I was very happy to hear that a few years ago, for the first time ever, we saw a decrease in carbon emissions in the US and parts of Europe where we also saw growth in the economy. That has never happened. In the first half of 2016 in the US we saw CO emissions that were as low as what we had in 1992.

    Sometimes I think it is just easier to be pessimistic. There is lots of work to do but people should also know what is working and that they can and are making a difference.

  4. Charlie S says:

    “Forest removal doesn’t cause water to somehow disappear.”

    There is a visible decrease in the flow of water when the forest surrounding streams are cut down or diminished due to development. Throughout my travels in suburbia New York I see sunk corridors in the earth near housing developments or shopping centers where once streams flowed through. Forests (trees) act as reservoirs that store the rainfall which feed brooks and rivers. Back in the 1800’s scientist knew that the streams in Europe shrunk as their forests were taken down. New York State’s Forest Commission, whose job it is to preserve the forests, knew that back then, and also they knew that the forests were vital for the conservation of our water supply. It is known by scientist that there is an increase in rainfall where forest are aplenty as trees supply moisture.

    So when
    “Colvin told men of business that if the northern forests were not protected, their priceless canals, the lifeblood of New York’s inland commercial shipping and key to its growing international status, would run dry”
    there was a large air of truth to what he said. I’ve been fascinated with this man’s writings for a number of years now. He was a genius and way ahead of his time as we are learning more and more as time ever so rapidly swooshes by. I visit his grave at least a few times a year…is how much he has left an impression on me.

  5. Charlie S says:

    “People should really look around and see what is really going on.”

    I totally agree with you on this one Paul and I would like to add…before the sky falls.

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *