Tuesday, August 26, 2014

Adirondacks May Become A Conduit For Tar-Sands Oil

Rail accident in Lac Megantic, Quebec in 2013 (Wikimedia photo)Four environmental organizations are sponsoring a forum in Plattsburgh this week on the dangers of transporting Bakken crude oil on trains through the Champlain Valley, but trains may someday be moving another hazardous fuel through the region: oil from the Canadian tar sands.

Global Companies receives Bakken crude at the Port of Albany, much of which is transported on a rail line that runs along the shore of Lake Champlain. Bakken crude is a volatile fuel that caused massive explosions when a train derailed in Quebec last year, killing forty-seven people.

The Adirondack Council, Adirondack Mountain Club, Center for Biological Diversity, and Lake Champlain Committee have invited federal officials, local emergency planners, and others to Thursday’s forum to discuss the risks of moving Bakken crude through the Champlain Valley. The forum will start at 7 p.m. in the Plattsburgh City Hall auditorium.

Global Companies wants to modify its operations at the Port of Albany so it can handle tar-sands oil, according to Earthjustice, a nonprofit organization that specializes in environmental legal issues.

Christopher Amato, an attorney at Earthjustice, said Global wants to install steam boilers at the port to heat tar-sands oil that would be brought to Albany on the same line. Because of its thickness, tar-sands oil must be heated before it can be transferred from railcars to storage tanks.

Amato said the tar-sands oil is not as volatile as Bakken crude, but he warned of an environmental disaster if tar-sands oil were to spill into Lake Champlain: because the oil is so heavy, it would sink to the bottom, making cleanup difficult and expensive.

“It’s like putting a layer of asphalt on the bottom of the lake,” remarked Amato, a former assistant commissioner for the state Department of Environmental Conservation.

DEC spokesman Pete Constantakes said Global has yet to confirm that it intends to receive tar-sands oil. “DEC will continue to demand this information from Global,” he said.

Earthjustice is representing three groups suing DEC and Global over its plans to expand operations at the Port of Albany. Last fall, DEC signed off on the plans, saying Global would not have to prepare an environmental impact statement. In its lawsuit, Earthjustice demands DEC rescind its decision and require an impact statement.

DEC itself seems to be having second thoughts. In March, the department wrote Global to say it was reviewing its earlier decision, which it characterized as interim. In reply, Global attorney Dean Sommer insisted that the decision was “final and binding” and that “the rule of law, not political considerations, must prevail in this process.”

DEC has extended the public comment period until September 30.

Amato said both the Bakken crude and tar-sands oil would be transported through the Champlain Valley on tracks owned by Canadian Pacific Railway, possibly on the same train. “You have one that is extremely explosive and very volatile, and the other is an ecological disaster on wheels,” he said. “The two of them together are the worst combination you could come up with.”

The tracks often lie within a stone’s throw of Lake Champlain. They cross through the city of Plattsburgh and over the Saranac, Ausable, and Boquet rivers. Environmentalists say the local trains contain up to a hundred oil cars and transport on average 3.4 million gallons of crude a day.

Environmentalists contend that the production and burning of tar-sands oil would contribute greatly to climate change and have been fighting the Keystone XL pipeline that would be used to transport the oil across Canada and the United States.

In the suit, Earthjustice is representing the Sierra Club, the Center for Biological Diversity, and the tenants of a housing project near the port. The Pace Environmental Litigation Clinic is representing Riverkeeper Inc. and the Waterkeeper Alliance.

Photo from Wikipedia: oil-train explosion in Lac-Megantic, Quebec.

A version of this story appears in the September/October issue of the Adirondack Explorer newsmagazine.

 

 

Related Stories


Phil Brown

Phil Brown is the former Editor of Adirondack Explorer, the regional bimonthly with a focus on outdoor recreation and environmental issues, the same topics he writes about here at Adirondack Almanack.

Phil is also an energetic outdoorsman whose job and personal interests often find him hiking, canoeing, rock climbing, trail running, and backcountry skiing.

He is the author of Adirondack Paddling: 60 Great Flatwater Adventures, which he co-published with the Adirondack Mountain Club, and the editor of Bob Marshall in the Adirondacks, an anthology of Marshall’s writings.

Visit Lost Pond Press for more information.




4 Responses

  1. Joseph loGiudice jr says:

    I strongly disagree with this proposal, those two products would be devastating if sonthing were to happen. Im sure they will take all necessary precautions because they are trained professionals who know their jobs well, but accidents happen as we all know. I feel we all need to stand together and preserve the adks, I’m sure there is a way around what little forest we have left.

  2. Paul says:

    Phil, “Conduit” was a neat choice of words. Makes perfect sense!

    It sounds like the DEC has (had) already made a decision. That was a mistake if they have changed their minds already. This will be costly. My guess is that there isn’t a single municipality along this route that is properly prepared to deal with a potential accident of any serious magnitude.

  3. See Healthy Schools Network mapping project online at http://www.healthyschools.org to find 75 public and private schools from Canadian border to Albany metro area within one mile(35 within 1/2 mile)of lines carrying crude.

    Rouses Point, Chazy, Beekmantown, Plattsburgh, Willsboro, Westport, Moriah, Crown Point, …. A catastrophic derailment on a school day near a central school could eliminate an entire generation.

  4. Phil Brown Phil Brown says:

    I saw DEC Commissioner Joe Martens on Tuesday and asked him a few questions about the Global Companies permit.

    1. He confirmed that DEC has asked Global what kind of oil it expects to receive but the company has not answered. He said it may be that the company doesn’t know for sure yet.

    2. He also said it is not unheard of for DEC to revisit a negative declaration. “We have not concluded we made a mistake, but we are reviewing all aspects.” It’s possible, he added, that DEC will reaffirm its earlier decision.

    3. He said one reason the department has extended the process is that “we’re not satisfied that the public has participated enough.” The Port of Albany is located near a poor neighborhood identified as an “environmental justice community.” DEC policy requires the department and permit applicants to take extra steps to ensure members of such communities take part in the decisions that affect their neighborhoods.