At the Adirondack Park Agency (APA) on Thursday, the State Lands Committee approved sending to the full Board a recommendation that proposed Community Connector Trail Plan Unit Management Plan (UMP) amendments should go to public comment. The plan favored a multi-use trail plan that included a series of new connector snowmobile trail segments. This recommendation was approved 3-1 over strenuous objections raised by the Committee Chairman Richard Booth.
On Friday, in response to concerns raised by the Adirondack Council and others, the APA commissioners voted unanimously to send to public review a proposed final plan that didn’t include a controversial trail segment that crossed the Hudson River at the Polaris Bridge.
The proposed Community Connector Multi-Use Trail Plan is now available for public review for 30 days to give people the opportunity to comment on the question of consistency between the Trail Plan and the Adirondack Park State Land Management Plan (SLMP). UMPs are site-specific plans that carry out the intent of the SLMP for each tract (unit) of Forest Preserve. The NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation (DEC) designs and proposes the UMPs. The APA administers the master plan and must agree that each unit plan complies with it.
The Adirondack Council wants to thank the Adirondack Park Agency and especially Commissioner Richard Booth and the staff, who made a strong case to the other 10 commissioners. They reaffirmed the arguments we made in our Monday letter to the APA, regarding the legally questionable process the agency was following by advancing a controversial new proposal from the DEC.
We also want to thank the others who expressed their objections to this controversial plan this week. This would have been a redundant and ecologically damaging trail. We don’t object to new trails, but we do object to trails – and processes to consider them – that are inconsistent with the law and harm the environment. And we have consistently opposed motorized or snowmobile use of the Polaris bridge crossing the Hudson, and a new snowmobile trail from that bridge through the Vanderwhacker Wild Forest.
The DEC plan includes a proposed final supplemental environmental impact statement (FSEIS) for the Community Connector (snowmobile) Trail Plan and related final UMP amendments. A prior draft, that didn’t include the Polaris Bridge trail segment (Section 5), had been released and commented on. It did, however, include another problematic and controversial proposed new snowmobile route, east-west through the Vanderwhacker Wild Forest. When the current proposed final plan was released before the APA Commissioners met, a significant change was the removal of one controversial trail and the addition of another.
The new proposed controversial snowmobile trail would have connected to the existing Polaris Bridge spanning a state-designated Scenic River section of the Hudson River. The bridge was not previously open to the public. The trail was routed to run north through the Vanderwhacker Mountain Wild Forest, along and generally parallel to the Hudson River. There already exists an Indian Lake-Newcomb community connector to the west and there are additional options for connecting communities without crossing the Hudson River or traversing the Vanderwhacker.
Advocates also argued during the week leading up to the APA meeting that the trail had a number of problems including the fact that it was redundant, inconsistent with the State Land Master Plan, and inconsistent with the State snowmobile guidance plan. Additional legal issues were detailed in the Adirondack Council’s letter of Monday May 11. The process by which the trail plan was being advanced also failed to consider the existing snowmobile trails found on the Cornell Road immediately to the west, and on the recently approved corridor between the Essex Chain Lakes Primitive Area and Hudson Gorge Wilderness Area.
On Monday, the Council urged the APA to reconsider this request by the DEC. We objected that notification of the proposed Final UMPs for the Connector Trail Plan came at very short public notice – less than 7 days from when it first appeared in the agenda for the monthly meeting of the APA. The APA’s staff originally stated in a cover memo that the recommendation on the DEC’s request was compliant with the SLMP. However, concerns raised by Commissioner Booth and the comment letters alerted the APA’s staff that the significant changes between the draft and final versions would require additional review to ensure compliance with the SLMP.
The removal of the controversial Section 5 does not mean the end to the community connector trail between Newcomb, Indian Lake, Minerva and beyond. There are routes, which are ecologically less harmful, safer for riders and closer to existing travel corridors, where local businesses are located. The Polaris Bridge route would have been redundant.
We are pleased that the APA exercised good judgment and carefully reviewed the significant issues Commissioner Booth, the Council, and others raised. The only thing worse than making a mistake, is failing to correct that mistake. Although we have additional concerns over other issues remaining in the trail plan, we appreciate the action taken by the APA on Friday.
Photo of the Polaris Bridge over the Hudson River by Lynda McIntyre.
Well said! I hope Almanack readers will weigh in for public comments (see link in piece above) during the public comment period.
One emendation I’d make to this piece. You said “The only thing worse than making a mistake, is failing to correct that mistake.” I’d add — “The only thing better than simply getting it right the first time is making a mistake, correcting it, and learning from that mistake so it doesn’t happen again.”
Hopefully the APA commissioners and staff have done just that.
Thanks for your efforts!!!
Why must everything in the Adirondacks be controversial? Not saying I am for or against this or that but am very tired of everything being controversial. It’s enough to make you want to move out of the Adirondacks and go someplace where important things are argued about.
I guess human animals just like to argue. The difference between human animals and all the other animals is that the other animals confine their arguments to life and death situations while humans will argue over just about anything.
Meanwhile, life goes on no matter who wins an argument.
@Pete: yes, it is pretty clear everywhere, from DC to my local town that everything is now an argument.
I also note a recent NYTimes article:
“Noise alone, they found, had harmful effects on many of the birds. “What we found was that they had lower overall body condition and they gained significantly less weight when the road was ‘on,’ ” Dr. Barber said. ”
Just another talking head dug up to provide an excuse to deny excess. Who paid for his study? The taxpayers or the environmental lobby?
The link in paragraph 3 is just a link back to this same story?
However they set this up it would probably make sense to keep the connector trail on public land. If they utilize private easement land you could end up losing those trails in the future and you would have to do this all over again.
This post has been updated to correct and clarify the UMP process. UMPs are separate site specific plans, not subsections of the SLMP. APA, not DEC, administers the SLMP – DEC is responsible for carrying out the plan.