Wednesday, July 3, 2019

Major Adirondack Conservation Reform Bill Falls Short

NYS capital buildingLegislation advanced in each house of the New York State Legislature this year that, if approved, would have amended the Adirondack Park Agency (APA) Act to require conservation development standards, clustering, and open space protections for the largest proposed subdivisions in the Adirondack Park.

The proposed bill would be the most significant amendment to the Land Use and Development Plan since enactment in 1973. The legislation gained some bi-partisan support but failed to advance in final days of the session when North Country representatives Senator Betty Little and Assemblymember Dan Stec lobbied to keep the bill from coming up for a vote.

The Adirondack Conservation Design legislation was originally introduced in 2015, and significantly revised through a collaborative process sponsored by the Adirondack Common Ground Alliance. Changes were made in that process to address Adirondack local government concerns by adding a density bonus, a transferable development rights program, protections for forest management, a streamlined regulatory review process, exemptions for small subdivisions, and a hardship variance, along with other changes.  The text of the current bill can be found online.

The Adirondack Council, Adirondack Mountain Club, Adirondack Wild: Friends of the Forest Preserve, and Protect the Adirondacks issued a statement about the bill’s failure to advance.  “Subdivision of land into large residential lots, or rural sprawl, impairs ecosystem function, decreases biotic integrity, alters species behavior and composition, increases human-wildlife conflicts, fragments ownership and forest health, impairs cohesive land management, undermines the open space character of the Park, and threatens its healthy timber industry,” the statement said.

“Conservation Development legislation sponsored by Assemblymember Steven Englebright and Senator Todd Kaminsky, respective Chairs of the Assembly and Senate Committees on Environmental Conservation, is designed to preserve the ecological integrity, wildlife health and open space in the Adirondack Park. The bill would strengthen the APA Land Use and Development Plan by incorporating modern conservation development principles and practices to curtail widely scattered exurban development, or “rural sprawl” in the Adirondack Park.”

“For the last 45 years, APA Land Use and Development Plan has been frozen in time. While many counties and local governments across New York has advanced and incorporated conservation development programs into their land use and zoning codes and ordinances, the APA has not been updated to apply conservation development principles. The vast proportion of large subdivisions approved by the APA have been typical grid layouts, resulting in undesirable consequences unbefitting the Adirondack Park, which the People of the State have sought to preserve since 1892,” said Peter Bauer, Executive Director of Protect the Adirondacks.

“We commend Assemblyman Steve Englebright and Senator Todd Kaminsky for steering this bill through their respective committees and for amending the bills to satisfy the concerns of local government leaders and Common Ground Alliance stakeholders,” said Adirondack Council Executive Director William C. Janeway. “We were disappointed to see progress come up short when Senator Betty Little and Assemblyman Dan Stec refused to support the compromise legislation.”

The APA Act and Land Use and Development Plan are based on zoning density. The two largest land use classifications are Resource Management areas (zoned at 15 principal buildings per square mile) and Rural Use (75 principal buildings per mile). Areas classified as Low Intensity allow 180 principal buildings per square mile. Adirondack Park advocates say that conservation science shows that the spatial pattern of development is as ecologically important as its density. The bill would have required that factors that impair ecological function in an area be identified early in the review process and be considered for certain large-scale residential subdivisions in Low Intensity, Rural Use and Resource Management areas.

“Conservation design for large subdivisions in sensitive parts of the Adirondack Park should be the standard, not the rare exception,” said Adirondack Wild’s David Gibson. “Not only would this legislation help to avoid forest and wildlife habitat fragmentation, it would be much fairer to the few large Park subdividers by requiring upfront site analysis and conceptual designs. That early review and selection of a design which avoids negative impacts on the environment saves money and avoids major controversies resulting from a lack of site information. Thanks to support this year in both the NYS Assembly and Senate and endorsement by local government leaders, we’re confident that this sensible and much needed legislation will be signed into law next year.”

“This legislation would strengthen the Adirondack Park Land Use and Development Plan by incorporating the most modern conservation design principles to preclude development sprawl in rural areas. This legislation would implement Conservation Subdivision planning (CSD) for development on large unsubdivided parcels in the Adirondack Park. CSDs are designs that protect sensitive areas and open space for ecological integrity while enhancing the quality of life for subdivision residents. CSDs are designed according to site-specific ecological preservation and forest stewardship plans which are prepared by qualified experts. We thank Assemblyman Steve Englebright and Senator Todd Kaminsky for advancing this landmark legislation,” said Neil F. Woodworth, Executive Director of the Adirondack Mountain Club.

“The Adirondack Council, Adirondack Mountain Club, Adirondack Wild: Friends of the Forest Preserve, and Protect the Adirondacks heartily commend Chairman Steven Englebright and Chairman Todd Kaminsky for living up to their word to pass the land bank bill, which established the new Health & Safety Land Account, a long-time priority for local government officials,” the joint statement said.

“The Conservation Development bill was and is a complement to the land bank legislation. Doing one, but not the other, fails Adirondack communities and the environment. The Health & Safety Land Account would never have been established without the support of Adirondack environmental organizations during review in the Legislature in 2016 and 2017 and advocacy prior to the statewide vote in November 2017.”

The Adirondack Park advoicates said they were also disappointed by the lack of leadership from the Adirondack Park Agency, which they say worked to undermine the legislation. “APA leadership has failed to engage on or provide suggestions for legislation to improve the APA Act despite invitations and presentations from national experts and scientists on the benefits of conservation development regulations,” their statement said.

The Adirondack Mountain Club, Adirondack Council, Protect the Adirondacks, and Adirondack Wild: Friends of the Forest Preserve say conservation development legislation to amend the APA Act remains a top priority and they will advocate for passage in 2020.

Photo: NYS capitol building.

Related Stories


Stories under the Almanack's Editorial Staff byline come from press releases and other notices. To have your news noticed here at the Almanack contact our editor John Warren at adkalmanack@gmail.com.




4 Responses

  1. Chris says:

    What’s the analysis of eho and why voted against it?

  2. Tim-Brunswick says:

    If “Betty Little” was against it then I’m more than pleased it failed. Not everybody that Cares for the Adirondacks agrees with the extremist views promoted by Adirondack Wild, Protect , etc., etc., etc….

    Frankly not everybody agrees with the favoritism shown those groups /viewpoints by this publication either!

    • Boreasfisher says:

      The article enumerates reasons galore for supporting this legislation and it came to pass through a process of finding compromise among stakeholders including representatives of the towns.

      If all one can say for rejecting a bill is that you don’t like the people who support it, one wonders whether the speaker has taken the time to inform himself independently, as a voter, on the issues.

  3. Davis Moquin says:

    Another sad day for better management of the Park. Clustering in the long run would enhance both economic and environmental goals
    > Powerful interests see it otherwise unfortunately and have once again ruled the day. Can’t help but believe that someone like Billy Jones might have an alternative point of view. Not only the Park but in fact the whole world has entered fairly perilous environmental times. NYS voters can’t fix the world alone but we sure the hell can improve Park policy.

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *